Delphinium Books

Offering readers the best in quality literature

  • Home
  • About
  • Our Books
  • Blog
  • Submissions
  • Contact
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram

Six Thoughts on Historical Fiction by Don Zancanella, author of A Storm in the Stars

August 8, 2022

I’ve now written two books set in the past:  Concord, which takes place in Massachusetts in the early 1840s, and my new novel from Delphinium, A Storm in the Stars, which takes place in England, France, Switzerland, and Italy between 1800 and 1825. While I don’t have a comprehensive theory of historical fiction, I’ve collected several observations and questions about fiction set in the past.

  1. For the most part, literary categories exist to help bookstores and libraries organize their books, publishers describe their books, and readers find the kind of books they like. Some categories seem to have rather firm identities and boundaries. Science fiction has communities of fans, awards, and a separate section in bookstores. Historical fiction has fuzzier boundaries and a less clear identity. Many stores don’t have a separate section for historical fiction. I tend to think of myself as the author of some novels that are set in the past rather than as a writer of something called “historical fiction.” From a writer’s perspective, fuzzy boundaries and imprecise identities are best.
  2.  There seems to be little agreement about how distant from the present the action in a novel has to be before it’s considered “historical.” A bookstore I frequent has recently added a Historical Fiction section. Hilary Mantel’s Wolf Hall, set in the 1500s, is shelved there but Jennifer Egan’s novel, Manhattan Beach, set in the 1940s, is not. Perhaps—and I say this only partly in jest—historical fiction is fiction in which the characters wear peculiar clothes.
  3. As a novel ages, the question of whether it will be identified as a work of historical fiction becomes more complicated. Hawthorne’s The Scarlet Letter is set in the 1640s and was published in 1850. Despite the 200-year differential, I don’t believe many readers think of Hawthorne’s novel as an example of historical fiction. Maybe that’s because looked at from 2022, both 1640 and 1850 seem merely to be “a long time ago.” Consider also Tolstoy’s War and Peace (set 60 years before its publication), Scott’s Ivanhoe (set 600 years before its publication), and Mary Shelley’s Valperga (set 500 years before its publication). In ways I can’t fully explain, thinking of a book as historical fiction seems to involve a calculation based on three points in time: the reader’s, the author’s, and the setting of the action in the book.

4. Nearly all works of fiction are set in a particular place and time. Is fiction set in the distant past—a work set during the American Civil War, for example—different in some fundamental way from fiction set in the present? One response would be to say that since readers know the present better than they know the past, the writer of historical fiction has a responsibility to explain the setting more completely. But a writer who sets a contemporary story in a place that most readers won’t have firsthand knowledge of bears a similar burden of explanation. Maybe a more useful term would be “novels with unfamiliar settings.” In a way, that’s what the term “science fiction” denotes—a reader who opens a work of science fiction expects to be dislocated in time and place.

5. We’re living in what could be considered a golden era of fiction about notable historical figures. Maybe the most highly praised has been Hillary Mantel’s “Wolf Hall” trilogy, about Thomas Cromwell, but there are also Colm Toibin’s The Master and The Magician, about Henry James and Thomas Mann respectively, Amy Bloom’s White Houses, about Eleanor Roosevelt and the journalist Lorena Hickock, and George Saunders’ Lincoln in the Bardo. What is it that’s causing writers to write about notable people from the past and readers to want to read such books? One theory I’ve heard is that as the writing of history has become more analytic and less narrative, fiction has stepped in the fill the gap. In my own case, I was so intrigued by Toibin’s The Master, that I found myself wondering if I could do something similar—not (I hope) because I lack imagination but because writers often find themselves conversing with or extending previous works of art. In my own mind, A Storm in the Stars is in conversation with Toibin’s The Master, Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein¸ Percy Bysshe Shelley’s poetry, and even Richard Holmes’ magnificent biography, Shelley: The Pursuit.

6. People tend to think that one of the distinguishing features of historical fiction is the amount of research required. This is true, but only to a point. If I decided to write a novel about campaign workers during the 2020 elections, I would have to do plenty of research because I’m not a campaign worker and know little of that world. By the same token, I could write a novel about the 1960s in Wyoming, the time and place in which I grew up, without doing much research at all. I do believe some writers of historical fiction rely on research a bit too much. While it’s important to avoid obvious gaffs, most readers care about character, plot, and language more than they do about historical details. As a reader, I’m unlikely to care if a character ties his shoe in a scene that takes place at a time before shoes with laces were common; yet, sometimes, while reading a novel set in the past, I feel that the writer’s pride in having gotten all the minuscule details right exceeds their pride in how convincingly they’ve portrayed a character’s inner life.

Some writers of historical fiction seem to be true history buffs. They find learning about and recreating people and events from the past endlessly fascinating. I don’t consider myself part of that group. Instead, I think I’m drawn to writing in his form because to find my voice, it helps me to have a good deal of distance from what I’m writing about. For me, writing in the first person about the present results in wooden sentences and lifeless paragraphs. Writing in the third person about people from two hundred years ago helps bring my words to life.

Filed Under: Delphinium Authors, General, New Books Tagged With: fiction, Frankenstein, Historical Fiction, Mary Shelley, on writing

The Kaminsky Cure

April 11, 2016

thekaminskycure

Well here I am at five and three-quarters

It’s Christmas 1939 in a little Austrian village that’s now part of Hitler’s Third Reich and I’m just beginning to notice things. Like what my brother and sisters are about and why my parents are often crying and my father usually shouting when he isn’t crying. I think it has something to do with the war we’re fighting, which according to the wireless is due to The International Jewish Conspiracy, whatever that is. But that’s not all. I don’t know it yet, but I was born at the wrong time and in the wrong place. [Read more…]

Filed Under: General Tagged With: Austria, fiction, half-Aryan, holocaust, Luthern, Nazis, Third Reich, war fiction, World War II

Book Awards: The Best Reader Wins!

November 21, 2015

The winners of the National Book Awards were selected this week following an evening in which all the nominees participated in a reading hosted by New School.University.  Even though I have no idea whether or not the judges attended the readings, I couldn’t help noticing that the best readers — at least in poetry and fiction — ended up winning in their categories.   [Read more…]

Filed Under: General Tagged With: Adam Johnson, Books, Charles Baxter, fiction, National Book Awards, poetry, prose, reading aloud, Sharon Olds, Word Theater

American Writers and the Booker Prize

October 18, 2015

I am one American writer who was disappointed when the Booker Prize decided to include works originally published in the U.S.A. I understand that this was a preemptive move to ensure that the Booker Prize, besides paying the most money of any major English-language prize, would hold onto its preeminence.  In my humble opinion, the prize always would have been preeminent due to the fact that the ceremony itself is televised and that a large percentage of the population in the UK actually watches the winner being announced.  This could never happen in the U.S.  There isn’t enough interest in such things, and even if there were, a televised literary ceremony would probably be preempted by some sporting event that would certainly draw down any potential audience.  Don’t get me wrong, Europeans watch sports as much as or more than we do; however, educated Europeans seem to have more time to devote to cultural awards or to the celebration of culture, itself.  In France, for example, a literary television show called Apostrophe was hugely popular until it went off the air, and any American published in French and whose French was good enough to be on the show, saw book sales spike in Oprah-like fashion.  Ask Paul Auster. [Read more…]

Filed Under: General Tagged With: American, Bob Marley, fiction, France, Hana Yanagihara, literature, Marlon James, minoroties, New York City, novelists, The Booker Prize, UK

Memoir Versus Novel

April 18, 2015

Bottoming Out Memoirs

 

Memoir Versus NovelI am not done weighing in about memoirs. While hiking on a neighbor’s land, it came to me that to create emotional resonance in a reader is a lot harder for a fiction-writer. Why?

[Read more…]

Filed Under: General Tagged With: autobiographical, bottoming out, dysfunctional, fiction, fiction-writing, imagination, James Frey, Memoir, memoirist, Nabokov, novelist, redemption, spiritual crisis, truth

Recent Posts

  • On the Line Between Memory and Invention Lies the Story by Kimberly Olson Fakih December 11, 2022
  • Six Thoughts on Historical Fiction by Don Zancanella, author of A Storm in the Stars August 8, 2022
  • Seeing Red – an essay by Margaret Hermes, author of The Opposite of Chance (available in paperback March 2022) April 20, 2022
  • In the Shadows of The Unknown Woman by Brooks Hansen October 18, 2021
  • Thoughts On Writing IN THE FIELD By Rachel Pastan August 3, 2021
  • Old Enough to Have Succeeded, but Also to Have Failed: on writing the short stories You Would Have Told Me Not To by Chris Coake available in paperback July 27, 2021 July 26, 2021

Categories

  • Delphinium Authors
  • General
  • New Books
  • News

Tags

1954 acceptance speech artists Austria autobiographical Books Booz Allen Hamilton bottoming out celebrity demotic Dostoyevsky dysfunctional Edward Snowden fame fiction fiction-writing Fitgerald Fuhrer George Elliot Germany Hemingway Historical Fiction holocaust imagination James Frey Jewish Karen Silkwood literature Memoir memoirist Middlemarch Nabokov Nazi Nazis Nobel Prize novelist novelists NSA Reading redemption Sobibor style World War II writers writing

Archives

  • December 2022
  • August 2022
  • April 2022
  • October 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2019
  • April 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • August 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • October 2013

© 2023 · Delphinium Books. All rights reserved.